Payment for Representation of a Social Security Claimant

A social security claimant may choose to be represented by a third party in his dealings with the Social Security Administration (SSA). If the third party accepts the role of "representative" on behalf of the claimant, he is prohibited from charging the claimant a fee without prior authorization from the SSA. This holds true even if the claim is denied. To obtain approval from the SSA, the representative must use either of two fee authorization processes.

Course of Employment and the Personal Comfort Doctrine

An employee injured in the course of employment is entitled to workers' compensation benefits. However, compensability may remain unaffected even if the injury occurred when the employee deviated from his specific job duties to engage in an activity that was purely personal in nature and solely for his own comfort. The personal comfort doctrine allows employees to slightly deviate from their job duties, within the usual time and space parameters of their employment, without losing workers' compensation protection. It is generally understood that employees should be able to tend to their physical needs, such as using the restroom, getting a drink of water, or even taking a break to smoke, during the course of their employment.

Black Lung Benefits Act - "Operators" and "Responsible Operators"

Under the Black Lung Benefits Act)

Domestic Servant Exemption

Workers' compensation coverage for domestic servants is limited. Such limitation is generally based on the exclusion for part-time employees or the statutory exemption for employers with less than the requisite minimum number of employees. Many states specifically exclude domestic servants from workers' compensation coverage. Others omit to place domestic servants on the list of covered employments. However, almost half of the states provide at least a measure of coverage for those employed as domestic servants.

Fault of Employee

A core principle within the area of workers' compensation is that the question of "fault" is largely irrelevant. It is only when the employee's "fault" in connection with the injury is occasioned by him leaving the course of employment or is a statutory defense in a jurisdiction will the inquiry come into play. The test for workers' compensation is generally not personal such that an employee's misconduct, whether negligent or intentional, will affect the receipt of benefits. Rather, the test is merely whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment.